Showing posts with label Wall Street. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wall Street. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

The Market Stars in 'Margin Call'

By Doug French
 
The 99 percent occupying Wall Street won't get much satisfaction from J.C. Chandor's Margin Call.
 
The occupiers want to believe that the 1 percent is Gordon Gekko stepping on their throat. Half the protesters are aged 20–29, highly educated, in hock up to their ears in student-loan debt, and unemployed. Surely this is someone's fault. The 99ers want what Wall Street has to offer: money, power, and a black town car to pick them up and shuttle them to and from work each day.
 
Forget peace on earth: these folks want to be Masters of the Universe. And they don't understand why their freshly minted diplomas haven't made that possible. However, the money, power, and lifestyle only percolates to a few; and when the asset bubbles pop, the party is over, and the falls from grace severe.
 
Margin Call opens with corporate soldiers being carried out on their shields, dismissed in the open, while those who remain nervously wonder if they are next.
 
Young members of the risk-management department of the mythical… (Read more)
 
Source: Mises.org

Saturday, October 29, 2011

In Defense of Flash Trading

By James E. Miller
 
It's fascinating to watch footage of a trading floor on Wall Street. Here men and women spend hours with their eyes glued to computer monitors while furiously calculating trades that often yield small profits or minimal losses. In the case of Swiss bank UBS trader Kweku Adoboli, it can result in a $2 billion loss and an unfortunate incarceration. The risks run high as trading requires a sizeable amount of dexterity and concentration to be successful in a network of like-minded profit seekers. Still, there is an underlying beauty to the process, as thousands (perhaps millions) of individuals coordinate their knowledge on the allocation of limited resources throughout the world.
 
Nobel laureate Friedrich Hayek dedicated much of life's work (brilliantly summed up in his classic essay "The Use of Knowledge in Society") showing us how knowledge and expertise are widely dispersed throughout society and can never reside in a single mind. That is to say, while individuals may use their own expertise and labor to create, they will never be in full possession of all available knowledge to account for the nuances of market and societal demands. The same concept applies to a government composed of fallible men — much to the dismay of statist ideologues such as Elizabeth Warren.
 
The limit of individual knowledge is what provided the initial need for social cooperation. Primitive man banded together with others, not under the auspices of creating one great state, but as a desire to utilize more resources and raise their own standard of living. Out of this grew the division of labor and… (Read more)
 
Source: Mises.org

Monday, October 17, 2011

Rothbard Revises the History of the Great Depression

By Paul Johnson
 
The Wall Street collapse of September–October 1929 and the Great Depression which followed it were among the most important events of the 20th century. They made the Second World War possible, though not inevitable, and by undermining confidence in the efficacy of the market and the capitalist system, they helped to explain why the absurdly inefficient and murderous system of Soviet communism survived for so long. Indeed it could be argued that the ultimate emotional and intellectual consequences of the Great Depression were not finally erased from the mind of humanity until the end of 1980s, when the Soviet collectivist alternative to capitalism crumbled in hopeless ruin and the entire world accepted there was no substitute for the market.
 
Granted the importance of these events, then, the failure of historians to explain either their magnitude or duration is one of the great mysteries of modern historiography. The Wall Street plunge itself was not remarkable, at any rate to begin with. The United States economy had expanded rapidly since the last downturn in 1920, latterly with the inflationary assistance of the bankers and the federal government. So a correction was due, indeed overdue. The economy in fact ceased to expand in June, and it was inevitable that this change in the real economy would be reflected in the stock market.
 
The bull market effectively came to an end on September 3, 1929, immediately the shrewder operators returned from vacation and looked hard… (Read the full article)
 
Source: Mises.org

Libertarians to Occupiers: Crony capitalism is the problem

WASHINGTON - Libertarian Party Chair Mark Hinkle released the following statement:
 
"I have been following the Occupy protesters, who call themselves the '99%', with interest.
 
"It's true that 99% of Americans do not enjoy the special benefits of crony capitalism. Crony capitalism is very different from real capitalism. In crony capitalism, government hands out special favors and protections to politically well-connected businesses.
 
"The TARP bailouts, Solyndra, and the military-industrial complex are all facets of crony capitalism.
 
"Libertarians love free markets and hate crony capitalism.
 
"Unfortunately, hypocritical Republican politicians have taught a lot of Americans to think that 'free markets' means freedom for government and big business to engage in crony capitalism.
 
"That's not what free markets are. A free market is where the government leaves businesses alone, does not attempt to pick winners and losers, does not stifle competition, does not hand out corporate welfare, and does not absolve businesses of liability for their actions. Most of our economy today does not resemble a free market at all.
 
"It's unfortunate that so many businesses today go to the government begging for handouts and special treatment. I wish they wouldn't. But the real problem is the politicians who choose to give those favors to them, at everyone else's expense.
 
"I hope the Occupy protesters will start to direct their anger away from Wall Street and big businesses, and toward our government, which has done so much to destroy free markets and entrench crony capitalism."
 
For more information, or to arrange an interview, call LP Executive Director Wes Benedict at 202-333-0008 ext. 222.
 
The LP is America's third-largest political party, founded in 1971.  The Libertarian Party stands for free markets, civil liberties, and peace. You can find more information on the Libertarian Party at our website.
 
P.S.  If you have not already done so, please join the Libertarian Party. We are the only political party dedicated to free markets, civil liberties, and peace. You can also renew your membership. Or, you can make a contribution separate from membership.

Saturday, September 10, 2011

VIDEO: American Jobs Act: Get the Facts

By Colleen Curtis


This evening, the President addressed a joint session of Congress and presented the American Jobs Act, a comprehensive plan to put America back to work. It was created from a set of ideas supported by both Democrats and Republicans, and it acknowledges that if we are going to restore America's middle class, we need to rebuild the economy the American way, based on balance, fairness and the same set of rules for everyone from Wall Street to Main Street.

Viewers who tuned in to watch it live-streamed from whitehouse.gov/live got an enhanced experience, one that included real time graphic elements that explained the research and the facts that helped inform some of aspects of the American Jobs Act. And now you can watch it that way, too.

You can download the fact sheet here.

Monday, August 22, 2011

Federal Reserve Board proposes phase-in period for most savings and loan holding companies to file regulatory reports

The Federal Reserve Board is proposing a two-year phase-in period for most savings and loan holding companies (SLHCs) to file Federal Reserve regulatory reports with the Board and an exemption for some SLHCs from initially filing Federal Reserve regulatory reports.

Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, supervisory and rulemaking authority for SLHCs and their nondepository subsidiaries transferred from the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) to the Board on July 21, 2011. On February 3, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board sought comment on its notice of intent to require SLHCs to submit the same reports as bank holding companies, beginning with the March 31, 2012, reporting period.

After consideration of the comments received on the notice of intent, the Federal Reserve Board proposes to exempt a limited number of SLHCs from initial regulatory reporting using the Federal Reserve's existing regulatory reports and a two-year phase-in period for regulatory reporting for all other SLHCs. Exempt SLHCs would continue to submit Schedule HC, which is currently a part of the Thrift Financial Report, and the OTS H-(b)11 Annual/Current Report.

The Federal Reserve Board will accept comments on the proposal through November 1, 2011.

For media inquiries, call 202-452-2977.

Thursday, July 21, 2011

VIDEO: What Wall Street Reform Means To You

By Katelyn Sabochik


One year ago today, President Obama signed the Wall Street Reform bill into law.

This groundbreaking law does three important things. First, it brings to an end taxpayer funded bailouts -- so taxpayers will never again be left paying the bill if a big bank fails. Second, it stops the reckless risk-taking by Wall Street that put consumers in jeopardy and led to the economic crisis. And third, this law puts in place the strongest consumer protections in history.

Here’s a quick video we put together last year to explain it.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Report Examines Differences Between Credit Scores Consumers and Lenders Receive

Consumers May Be Unaware of Variety of Credit Scores Available

WASHINGTON – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released a report today examining the differences between credit scores sold to consumers and scores used by lenders to make credit decisions.

“The consumer bureau’s mission is to bring transparency to the consumer financial markets so families can compare products and choose the ones that are right for them,” said Elizabeth Warren, Special Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury on the CFPB. “One way consumers have tried to empower themselves is by knowing their credit scores. We are assessing whether purchasing a credit score provides a consumer with the information he or she needs. ”

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) required the CFPB to study the differences between credit scores consumers purchase and those creditors use to make credit decisions. The CFPB’s report covers the process of developing credit scoring models, why different scoring models may produce different scores for the same consumer, how different scoring models are used by creditors in the marketplace, what credit scores are available to consumers for purchase, and ways that differences between the scores provided to creditors and those provided to consumers may disadvantage consumers.

Consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) compile and maintain files on consumers that are used to produce credit reports. Credit scores are numerical summaries of the comparative credit risks of default; they are calculated based on information contained in credit files and credit reports. These scores are important because they are used to make credit-granting decisions, to identify prospects for credit offers and solicitations, to make decisions about raising or lowering credit limits on credit cards, and to set terms for mortgages or other loans, among other uses.

While most credit scores are purchased by lenders and other users to assess consumers’ credit risk, consumers can also purchase credit scores when they obtain their free annual credit reports, when they request copies of their credit reports directly from CRAs, or when they enroll in “credit monitoring” services that offer credit reports and scores for a monthly subscription fee. The credit scores available for purchase by consumers may vary from the score used by a lender for a variety of reasons, including:

•Use of different scoring models;
•Lenders and consumers may not use the same CRA;
•Data in the consumer’s credit reports change between the time the consumer purchases a score and the time the lender obtains the score;•A consumer and a lender  could possibly access different reports from the CRA, if they were to use different identifying information about the consumer;The report discusses the general lack of information about credit scoring. One survey shows that many consumers do not know that a credit score represents the risk of not repaying a loan. Furthermore, many consumers do not know that credit scores they buy may not use the same credit scoring models that are most widely used by lenders.

Consumers who are unaware of the variety of credit scores available in the marketplace may purchase a score believing it to be their “true” score. The most significant adverse impact on a consumer from score differences would likely occur if the credit scores the consumer buys give a substantially different impression of his or her credit risk than credit scores that a lender would use.

As a follow-up to the report, the CFPB is obtaining data from each of the three nationwide CRAs, and credit scores from the CRAs and Fair Isaac Corporation widely used by lenders and consumers to compare the variations between the credit scores sold to lenders and those sold to consumers. To help educate consumers, the CFPB also plans to post advice on its website about how to obtain and maintain a good credit score.

Video: President Obama Nominates Richard Cordray to Lead Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

By Nikki Sutton

Today President Obama took a big step forward in his goal to strengthen the economy and strengthen the middle class with the nomination of Richard Cordray as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.


It has been one year since President Obama passed financial reform to help tackle the problems that created the financial crisis that pulled the economy into the worst recession we've seen since the Great Depression, As the President described today, the law did three things, "First, it made taxpayer-funded bailouts illegal, so taxpayers don’t have to foot the bill if a big bank goes under. Second, it said to Wall Street firms, you can’t take the same kind of reckless risks that led to the crisis. And third, it put in place the strongest consumer protections in history."

As part of financial reform, President Obama tasked one consumer watchdog with "looking out for regular people in the financial system."  The President got the idea from Elizabeth Warren:  

“And that’s why I asked Elizabeth Warren to set up this new bureau.  Over the past year she has done an extraordinary job.  Already, the agency is starting to do a whole bunch of things that are going to be important for consumers -- making sure loan contracts and credit card terms are simpler and written in plain English.  Already, thanks to the leadership of the bureau, we’re seeing men and women in uniform who are getting more protections against fraud and deception when it comes to financial practices. And as part of her charge, I asked Elizabeth to find the best possible choice for director of the bureau.

Richard was one of the first people that Elizabeth recruited, and he’s helped stand up the bureau’s enforcement division over the past six months.  I should also point out that he took this job –- which meant being away from his wife and 12-year-old twins back in Ohio –- because he believed so deeply in the mission of the bureau.  Prior to this, as Ohio’s attorney general, Rich helped recover billions of dollars in things like pension funds on behalf of retirees, and stepped up the state’s efforts against unscrupulous lending practices.  He’s also served as Ohio’s treasurer and has successfully worked with people across the ideological spectrum  -– Democrats and Republicans, banks and consumer advocates.

Now, last but not least, back in the ‘80s, Richard was also a five-time Jeopardy champion -- and a semi-finalist in the Tournament of Champions.  Not too shabby.  That’s why all his confirmation -- all his answers at his confirmation hearings will be in the form of a question.  That’s a joke.”

The President also spoke about the tens of millions of dollars lobbyists and lawyers have spent this year to try to weaken the laws to protect consumers and undo progress:

“The fact is the financial crisis and the recession were not the result of normal economic cycles or just a run of bad luck.  They were abuses and there was a lack of smart regulations.  So we’re not just going to shrug our shoulders and hope it doesn’t happen again.  We’re not going to go back to the status quo where consumers couldn’t count on getting protections that they deserved.  We’re not going to go back to a time when our whole economy was vulnerable to a massive financial crisis.  That’s why reform matters.  That’s why this bureau matters.  I will fight any efforts to repeal or undermine the important changes that we passed.  And we are going to stand up this bureau and make sure it is doing the right thing for middle-class families all across the country.

Middle-class families and seniors don’t have teams of lawyers from blue-chip law firms.  They can’t afford to hire a lobbyist to look out for their interests.  But they deserve to be treated honestly.  They deserve a basic measure of protection against abuse.  They shouldn’t have to be a corporate lawyer in order to be able to read something they’re signing to take out a mortgage or to get a credit card.  They ought to be free to make informed decisions, to buy a home or open a credit card or take out a student loan, and they should have confidence that they’re not being swindled.  And that’s what this consumer bureau will achieve.”

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Agencies Adopt a Final Rule to Establish a Risk-Based Capital Floor

Three federal banking regulatory agencies adopted a final rule that establishes a floor for the risk-based capital requirements applicable to the largest, internationally active banking organizations. The rule, finalized by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, is consistent with the requirements of Section 171 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

A banking organization operating under the agencies' advanced approaches risk-based capital rules is required to meet the higher of the minimum requirements under the general risk-based capital rules and the minimum requirements under the advanced approaches risk-based capital rules.

The rule also provides limited flexibility to establish appropriate capital requirements for certain low-risk exposures that, in general, are not held by insured depository institutions, but may be held by depository institution holding companies or nonbank financial companies supervised by the Federal Reserve Board.

The final rule will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register; publication is expected soon.

Media Contacts: 
Federal Reserve Board  Barbara Hagenbaugh  202-452-2955 
FDIC  David Barr  202-898-6992 
OCC  Dean DeBuck  202-874-5770 

Friday, June 10, 2011

Federal Reserve seeks comment on annual capital plan reviews

The Federal Reserve Board is seeking comment on a proposal to require top-tier U.S. bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or greater to submit annual capital plans for review.

The aim of the capital plan review, which builds on the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) conducted earlier this year, is to ensure that institutions have robust, forward-looking capital planning processes that account for their unique risks and that permit continued operations during times of economic and financial stress. Institutions would be expected to have credible plans to have sufficient capital so that they can continue to lend to households and businesses, even under adverse conditions. Boards of directors of the institutions would be required each year to review and approve capital plans before submitting them to the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve would evaluate institutions' plans to make capital distributions, such as increasing dividend payments or repurchasing or redeeming stock, as part of the capital plan reviews. In some cases, such as when institutions' capital plans have been rejected by the Federal Reserve, firms would be required to receive approval from the Federal Reserve before making capital distributions.

The proposal would institutionalize the recently completed CCAR exercise. The CCAR involved a forward-looking analysis of the capital plans at the 19 largest U.S. bank holding companies. The CCAR followed the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), a standardized stress test led by the Federal Reserve in 2009.

As of March 31, the most recent available data, 35 U.S. bank holding companies had assets of at least $50 billion. According to the proposal, the level of detail and analysis expected in each institution's capital plan would vary based on the company's size, complexity, risk profile, and scope of operations. The Federal Reserve plans to finalize the proposal later this year and to begin the annual capital plan reviews in early 2012.

The proposed capital plans would complement a number of components of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, including the development of enhanced prudential standards for large firms and required stress tests. As the Federal Reserve implements the Dodd-Frank Act, it is expected that the company-run Dodd-Frank stress tests will serve as one component of institutions' capital plans.

The Federal Reserve requests comments on the capital plan review proposal, which will be published soon in the Federal Register, by August 5, 2011.

For media inquiries, call 202-452-2955.