Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Ron Paul Comments on Fed Actions in Europe

“…another reason why Congress needs enhanced power to oversee and audit the Fed.”
 
LAKE JACKSON, Texas – 2012 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul, who serves as Chairman of the Monetary Policy Subcommittee on the House Financial Services Committee, released a statement today regarding the Federal Reserve’s latest actions coordinating with other central banks in an effort to intervene in Europe’s debt crisis. See below for statement.
 
“The Fed’s latest actions in cooperating with foreign central banks to undertake liquidity swaps of dollars for foreign currencies is another reason why Congress needs enhanced power to oversee and audit the Fed.  Under current law Congress cannot examine these types of agreements.  Those who would argue that auditing the Fed or these agreements with central banks harms the Fed’s independence should reevaluate the Fed’s supposed independence when the Fed bails out Europe so soon after President Obama promised US assistance in resolving the Euro crisis.
 
“Rather than calming markets, these arrangements should indicate just how frightened governments around the world are about the European financial crisis.  Central banks are grasping at straws, hoping that flooding the world with money created out of thin air will somehow resolve a crisis caused by uncontrolled government spending and irresponsible debt issuance.  Congress should not permit this type of open-ended commitment on the part of the Fed, a commitment which could easily run into the trillions of dollars.  These dollar swaps are purely inflationary and will harm American consumers as much as any form of quantitative easing.
 
“The Fed is behaving much as it did during the 2008 financial crisis, only this time instead of bailing out politically well-connected too-big-to-fail firms it is bailing out profligate government spending. Citizens the world over deserve better than this. They deserve sound money that cannot be manipulated and created out of thin air by central planners who promise printed prosperity. Fiat money caused this European crisis and the financial crisis before it.  More fiat money is not the cure. The global fiat currency system has proven itself a failure, we need real monetary reform. We need sound money. ”

The Market and the Distribution of Wealth

By Ludwig M. Lachmann

Everywhere today in the free world we find the opponents of the market economy at a loss for plausible arguments. Of late the "case for central planning" has shed much of its erstwhile luster. We have had too much experience of it. The facts of the last 40 years are too eloquent.
 
Who can now doubt that, as Professor Mises pointed out 30 years ago, every intervention by a political authority entails a further intervention to prevent the inevitable economic repercussions of the first step from taking place? Who will deny that a command economy requires an atmosphere of inflation to operate at all, and who today does not know the baneful effects of "controlled inflation?" Even though some economists have now invented the eulogistic term "secular inflation" in order to describe the permanent inflation we all know so well, it is unlikely that anyone is deceived. It did not really require the recent German example to demonstrate to us that a market economy will create order out of "administratively controlled" chaos even in the most unfavorable circumstances. A form of economic organization based on voluntary cooperation and the universal exchange of knowledge is necessarily superior to any hierarchical structure, even if in the latter a rational test for the qualifications of those who give the word of command could exist. Those who are able to learn from reason and experience knew it before, and those who are not are unlikely to learn it even now.
 
Confronted with this situation the opponents of the market economy have shifted their ground; they now oppose it on "social" rather than economic grounds. They accuse it of being unjust rather than… (Read more)
 
Source: Mises.org

Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission Meet with Chinese Ministry of Commerce on Merger Enforcement Matters

WASHINGTON – Acting Assistant Attorney General Sharis Pozen of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Jon Leibowitz today met with a delegation from China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) to discuss antitrust merger enforcement.  The delegation was led by China International Trade Representative and MOFCOM Vice Minister Gao Hucheng.  MOFCOM is responsible for handling reviews of mergers and acquisitions under China’s Antimonopoly Law.
 
 This is the first high-level MOFCOM visit to the U.S. antitrust agencies since the department and the FTC signed an antitrust memorandum of understanding (MOU) with China’s three antimonopoly agencies in July 2011, to promote communication and cooperation among the antitrust enforcement agencies in both countries.
 
 The discussion topics in today’s meeting included recent antitrust enforcement and policy developments, the role of antitrust enforcement in times of economic downturn and cooperation among the three agencies on merger enforcement issues.  The three agencies developed further guidance for cooperation on investigations when one of the U.S. antitrust agencies and MOFCOM are reviewing the same merger.
 
Department and FTC officials said that the discussions with the delegation from MOFCOM were productive, and that they look forward to continuing their cooperative relationship.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Thomas Jefferson's Free-Market Economics

By Murray N. Rothbard
 
Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826) had been a friend and admirer of the philosophes and ideologues since the 1780s when he served as minister to France. When the ideologues achieved some political power in the consular years of Napoleon, Jefferson was made a member of the "brain trust" Institut National in 1801. The ideologues — Cabanis, DuPont, Volney, Say, and de Tracy — all sent Jefferson their manuscripts and received encouragement in return. After he finished the Commentary on Montesquieu, de Tracy sent the manuscript to Jefferson and asked him to have it translated into English. Jefferson enthusiastically translated some of it himself, and then had the translation finished and published by the Philadelphia newspaper publisher William Duane. In this way, the Commentary appeared in English (1811), eight years before it could be published in France. When Jefferson sent the published translation to de Tracy, the delighted philosopher was inspired to finish his Traité de la volonté and sent it quickly to Jefferson, urging him to translate that volume.
 
Jefferson was highly enthusiastic about the Traité. Even though he himself had done much to prepare the way for war with Great Britain in 1812, Jefferson was disillusioned by the public debt, high taxation, government spending, flood of paper money, and burgeoning of privileged bank monopolies that accompanied the war. He had concluded that his beloved Democratic-Republican Party had actually adopted the economic policies of the despised Hamiltonian federalists, and de Tracy's bitter attack on these policies prodded Jefferson to try to get the Traité translated into English. Jefferson gave the new manuscript to Duane again, but the latter went bankrupt, and Jefferson then revised the faulty English translation Duane had commissioned. Finally, the translation was published as the Treatise on Political Economy, in 1818.
 
Former President John Adams, whose ultra-hard-money and 100 percent-specie-banking views were close to Jefferson's, hailed the de Tracy Treatise as the best book on economics yet published. He particularly… (Read more) ​
 
Source: Mises.org

Treasury Department Announces Public Offering of Warrants to Purchase Common Stock of Associated Banc-Corp

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of the Treasury announced today that it has commenced a secondary public offering of 3,983,308 warrants to purchase the common stock of Associated Banc-Corp (the “Company”). The proceeds of this sale will provide an additional return to the American taxpayer from Treasury’s investment in the Company beyond the dividend payments it received on the related preferred stock. The offering is expected to price through a modified Dutch auction. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. is the sole book-running manager for this offering.
 
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., in its capacity as auction agent, has specified that the auction will commence at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on November 30, 2011, and will close at 6:30 p.m., Eastern Time, on that same day (the “submission deadline”). During the auction period, potential bidders for the warrants will be able to place bids at any price (in increments of $0.05) at or above the minimum bid price of $0.50 per warrant.
 
The auction procedure, and the exercise price, expiration, and other terms of the warrants are described in the preliminary prospectus supplement referenced below.
 
The warrants are being offered pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement that has been filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). A preliminary prospectus supplement related to the offering will be filed by the Company with the SEC and will be available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of the final prospectus supplement relating to these securities may be obtained, when available, from Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Prospectus Department, Harborside Financial Center, 100 Plaza One, Jersey City, New Jersey 07311-3988, telephone: 1-800-503-4611, or by emailing prospectus.cpdg@db.com. Before you invest, you should read the prospectus and prospectus supplement in the registration statement and other documents the Company has filed with the SEC for more complete information about the Company and the warrants.
This news release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.

Friday, November 25, 2011

A Case for Free-Market Bank Regulation

By Anthony W. Hager
 
Bank of America (BAC) has rescinded its plan to charge customers a $5 monthly debit-card fee. Shall we praise bank regulators for their swift action in preventing the exorbitant charge? Well, no. Then we'll credit politicians for legislating against greedy, big-bank profiteering, right? Wrong again. The free market drove BAC to drop the debit-card fee.
 
Several banks have floated similar debit-card fees — some already assess the monthly charge — and each met the same fate as BAC. Customers informed their financial institutions that they would rather pull their assets than pay the fee. Banks responded in predictable fashion. Banks need customers in order to remain solvent; therefore they heed their customers' complaints and outrage, whether or not they are reasonable. That's the free market in action. Unpopular fees and programs are abandoned just as surely as profits are taken. Everything depends on what the market will bear.
 
The $5 debit-card charge was never a product of free-market capitalism. It was the result of political machinations, most notably on the part of Senator Dick Durbin. Durbin's amendment to the Dodd-Frank bank reform legislation placed an arbitrary cap on debit-card interchange fees, which banks impose on retailers for each swipe of a customer's card.
 
Banks collect this fee to maintain their electronic networks, retailers distribute the fee among their customers, and customers enjoy the convenience of cashless transactions… (Read more)
 
Source: Mises.org

2011 America the Beautiful Five Ounce Silver Uncirculated Coin™ – Olympic National Park Available November 29

WASHINGTON - Collectors may begin ordering the 2011 America the Beautiful Five Ounce Silver Uncirculated Coin - Olympic National Park (Washington) on November 29 at noon Eastern Time (ET).  The current price of the coin is $229.95; however, as with all United States Mint products containing precious metals, pricing is subject to change.
 
A maximum mintage limit of 35,000 units has been set for each of the 2011 America the Beautiful Five Ounce Silver Uncirculated Coins.  Orders will be limited to five coins per household for the first week of sales.  At the end of one week, the United States Mint will re-evaluate this limit and either extend, adjust or remove it. 
 
The America the Beautiful Five Ounce Silver Uncirculated Coins are collector versions of those issued through the America the Beautiful Silver Bullion CoinTM Program.  The three-inch uncirculated coins feature the same designs that appear on the bullion coins and the corresponding circulating quarters issued through the America the Beautiful Quarters® Program.
 
The America the Beautiful Five Ounce Silver Uncirculated Coins are struck in .999 fine silver and display the "P" mint mark indicating production at the United States Mint at Philadelphia.  To protect the uncirculated finish, each coin is enclosed in a capsule and an attractive presentation case.  A Certificate of Authenticity is included with each coin. 
 
The United States Mint will accept orders at http://www.usmint.gov/catalog and at 1-800-USA-MINT (872-6468).  Hearing- and speech-impaired customers with TTY equipment may order at 1-888-321-MINT (6468).  A shipping and handling fee of $4.95 will be added to all domestic orders. 
 
The United States Mint, created by Congress in 1792, is the Nation's sole manufacturer of legal tender coinage and is responsible for producing circulating coinage for the Nation to conduct its trade and commerce.  The United States Mint also produces proof, uncirculated and commemorative coins; Congressional Gold Medals; and silver, gold and platinum bullion coins.
 
Note:  To ensure that all members of the public have fair and equal access to United States Mint products, orders placed prior to the official on-sale date and time of November 29, 2011, noon ET shall not be deemed accepted by the United States Mint and will not be honored.  For more information, please review the United States Mint's Frequently Asked Questions, Answer ID #175.

Two Banks Repay $210 Million in Tarp Funds, Provide Additional Positive Return on TARP Bank Programs for Taxpayers

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of the Treasury announced that the following two financial institutions have repurchased Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program (CPP) investments, delivering a total of $210 million in proceeds today for taxpayers.
•Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation (Crestview Hills, KY): Repurchased all outstanding CPP preferred shares from Treasury’s original investment in the institution totaling $17.0 million and paid accrued dividends totaling $18,888. (Total Proceeds Today for Taxpayers: $17.0 million) Including today’s transaction, taxpayers received total dividends of $3.9 million from Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation over the life of this $34.0 million TARP investment. Note: Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation also repurchased CPP preferred shares totaling $17 million on December 22, 2010.
•First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. (Itasca, Illinois): Repurchased all outstanding CPP preferred shares from Treasury’s original investment in the institution totaling $193.0 million and paid accrued dividends totaling $214,444. (Total Proceeds Today for Taxpayers: $193.2 million) Including today’s transaction, taxpayers received total dividends of $28.6 million from First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. over the life of this $193.0 million TARP investment.
Treasury continues to hold warrants to purchase common stock in Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation and First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. – the disposition of which would provide an additional return to the American taxpayer from Treasury’s investment beyond the dividend payments it received on the related preferred stock.
 
In March 2011, Treasury announced that TARP’s bank programs turned a profit. Since that time, further repayments and income through TARP’s bank programs, such as the payment announced today, provide additional positive returns for taxpayers.
 
With today’s proceeds, taxpayers have now recovered more than $258 billion from TARP’s bank programs through repayments, dividends, interest, and other income. That exceeds the original financial support Treasury made through those programs ($245 billion) by approximately $13 billion.

Thursday, November 24, 2011

Thanksgiving and Marginal Utility

By Gary North
 
O give thanks unto the LORD; for he is good: for his mercy endureth for ever. O give thanks unto the God of gods: for his mercy endureth for ever. O give thanks to the Lord of lords: for his mercy endureth for ever (Psalm 136:1–3)
 
This phrase appears in many of the psalms, but when you find the same phrase three times in a row, you can safely conclude that the writer was trying to make a point, and he thought the point was important. I know of no passage in the Bible where any other phrase appears three times in succession.
 
Thanksgiving Day is an old tradition in the United States. Although it was not the first such thanksgiving feast, the holiday had its origins in Plymouth Colony, in the fall of 1621, when the Pilgrims who had survived the first year invited Chief Massasoit to a feast, and he showed up with 90 braves and five deer. The feast lasted three days.
 
There had been a thanksgiving day of prayer and a feast in Maine in 1607. The tiny colony was abandoned a year later. There had also been a thanksgiving service in Jamestown in 1610, but it did not involve a feast.
 
The first official Thanksgiving Day was celebrated on June 29, 1676 in Charlestown, Massachusetts, across the Charles River from Boston. But Gov. Jonathan Belcher had issued similar proclamations in Massachusetts in 1730 and in New Jersey in 1749. George Washington proclaimed a day of thanksgiving on October 23, 1789, to be celebrated on Thursday, November 27. In 1863, Abraham Lincoln officially restored it as a wartime measure. The holiday then became an American tradition. It became law in 1941.
 
Lincoln was a strange contradiction religiously. He was a religious skeptic, yet he invoked the rhetoric of the King James Bible — accurately — on many occasions. His political rhetoric, which had been deeply influenced by his reading of the King James, was often masterful. For example, when he spoke of the… (Read more)
 
Source: Mises.org

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Steve Jobs Was No Innovator — He Was Better

By Devin Leary-Hanebrink
 
 Over the past few months since his unfortunate passing, the media has consistently praised Steve Jobs for his many talents. Frequently, he has been described as one of history's greatest innovators, standing shoulder to shoulder with the likes of Einstein, Da Vinci, and the Wright brothers. While such statements about Jobs's talents are not false, they certainly miss the point.
 
To "innovate" is to "introduce or make new." Jobs rarely accomplished this feat. In fact, Jobs was notorious for plagiarizing great ideas. He poached the concept of a graphical user interface (GUI) from Xerox. He bought Pixar from George Lucas. He copied Sony's Walkman. He was even a poor programmer, relying heavily on Steve Wozniak's talent during Apple's formative years. Furthermore, in a 1996 interview for the PBS series Triumph of the Nerds, Jobs himself admitted, "We have always been shameless about stealing great ideas."
 
But back in the 1970s, while his computer club was happy meeting once a week, IBM was content selling mainframes, and Microsoft was a small startup in New Mexico, Jobs already recognized the power of this new technology and envisioned personal computers in every home in the world.
 
Jobs the Entrepreneur… (Read more)
 
Source: Mises.org

Remarks by Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner on Targeting Iran’s Nuclear and Missile Programs

As Prepared for Delivery
 
Thank you, Secretary Clinton.
 
I want to thank you, and I want to commend my colleague at Treasury, David Cohen, and his counterparts here at the State Department for working so hard to put together today’s very significant financial actions.
 
Since President Obama came into office, this administration has put in place an aggressive strategy to stop Iran’s illicit activities.  A key part of this strategy has been to impose overwhelming financial pressure on Iran. 
 
Because of this strategy, Iran has been subjected to new and damaging levels of financial and commercial isolation. 
 
First, we have dramatically reduced Iran’s access to the international financial system.  Iranian banks are losing the ability to do business around the world, which in turn has reduced the ability of the Iranian government to finance activities opposed by the international community.
 
Second, Iran’s national shipping line – which has transported material in support of Iran’s missile program – is now shut off from many of the world’s major ports and routinely finds its ships seized or turned away.
 
And third, Iran’s primary source of revenue – its oil sector – is in decline, because it cannot attract the foreign investment that it desperately needs to maintain production.
 
Together, the intensification of sanctions by this Administration, alongside our partners around the world, has inflicted substantial damage to the Iranian economy.
 
To continue these efforts, the Treasury Department today is designating additional entities for their support of Iran’s nuclear and proliferation-related activities.
 
Today we are also taking the next significant step to escalate the pressure by acting under Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act. For the first time, we are identifying the entire Iranian banking sector – including the Central Bank of Iran – as a threat to governments or financial institutions that do business with Iranian banks.
 
If you are a financial institution and you engage in any transaction involving Iran’s Central Bank or any other Iranian bank operating inside or outside Iran, you are at risk of supporting Iran’s illicit activities:  its pursuit of nuclear weapons, its support for terrorism, and its efforts to deceive responsible financial institutions and evade sanctions.
 
Any and every financial transaction with Iran poses grave risk of supporting those activities.
 
Financial institutions around the world should think hard about the risks of doing business with Iran.
 
We are taking this latest action alongside our partners in the United Kingdom and Canada, who announced earlier today that they have implemented similar measures to insulate their banks from Iran. As a result of this coordinated effort, Iran is now cut off from three of the world’s largest financial sectors. 
 
We encourage other leaders around the world to take forceful steps – like the action we are announcing today – to prevent Iran from simply shifting financial activity to banks within their nations. 
 
As we put these new measures in place, and as we continue to work to expand their reach around the world, we will continue to explore other measures.  No option is off the table—including the possibility of imposing additional sanctions on the Central Bank of Iran.
 
The policies Iran is pursuing are unacceptable.  Until Iran’s leadership agrees to abandon this dangerous course, we will continue to use tough and innovative means to impose severe economic and financial consequences on Iran’s leadership.  
 
Thank you.

Former Senior Trader at Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC Pleads Guilty to Creating Fake Trades

NEW YORK, NY—David L. Kugel, a former senior trader in the Market Making and Proprietary Trading operations of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (BLMIS), pleaded guilty today in Manhattan federal court to a six-count superseding information related to his conduct while employed at BLMIS, announced Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Kugel admitted that, beginning in the early 1970s, he helped create fake, backdated trades for the purpose of defrauding BLMIS’s investment advisory (IA) clients. Kugel pleaded guilty today before U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain to two counts of conspiracy, as well as substantive counts of securities fraud, falsifying books and records of a broker-dealer, falsifying books and records of an investment adviser, and bank fraud. In addition to pleading guilty, Kugel agreed to cooperate with the government in its ongoing investigation of the fraud that occurred at BLMIS.
 
According to the superseding Information, plea agreement and other documents filed in connection with the case:
 
Kugel was employed at BLMIS from 1970 through Dec. 11, 2008. Beginning in 1970, Kugel was a trader in BLMIS’s Proprietary Trading and Market Making operations. In the late 1990s, he assumed a managerial position on the trading floor and later took on the role of “trading floor compliance analyst.”
 
From the 1970s through the collapse of BLMIS, Kugel provided historical trade information to other BLMIS employees, including Annette Bongiorno and Joann Crupi, which allegedly enabled them to create fake trades. Beginning in the early 1970s, Kugel provided certain historical information to Bongiorno so that she could select particular stocks and purchase prices to be used for each IA client, in order to meet the rate of return pre-determined by Bernard Madoff for that client. The information that Kugel provided included stock names; the buy and sell dates of potential trades; as well as the historical price ranges of those stocks for the respective dates that Bongiorno could allegedly use to make a profit. Kugel’s information often mimicked trades previously executed in connection with BLMIS’s proprietary trading operation. Beginning in the early 1990s, Kugel similarly provided Crupi with historical price information to enable her to allegedly create false, backdated trades for IA clients. These false, backdated trades were used to defraud IA clients because, when included on their account statements and trade confirmations, they gave the appearance of profitable trading when none, in fact, had occurred.
In addition, Kugel, and allegedly Crupi and others, defrauded numerous banks by using false financial information to obtain loans. On multiple occasions, Kugel and allegedly Crupi, submitted false and misleading information to banks concerning Kugel’s assets and the assets of others, in order to obtain loans for the purchase and construction of homes. With the assistance of Crupi and others, Kugel obtained multiple million-dollar loans based on the submission of this fraudulent information.
 
Kugel, 66, faces a total statutory maximum sentence of 85 years in prison. A chart identifying the maximum penalties for each of the charged offenses is attached to this release. Kugel is also subject to mandatory restitution and criminal forfeiture and faces criminal fines up to twice the gross gain or loss derived from the offense. According to the agreements entered into with the government, Kugel has agreed to forfeiture of more than $170 billion, including his interests in homes, a luxury car, various accounts at financial institutions and other specific assets. The net proceeds from the sale of the forfeited property will be used to compensate victims of the fraud, consistent with applicable Department of Justice regulations.
 
Following the guilty plea, Judge Swain released Kugel on a $3 million bond on the condition that the bond be co-signed by six financially responsible individuals and secured by $900,000 in cash and property. In addition, Kugel’s travel is restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and the District of New Jersey. He will be subject to strict pretrial supervision. Kugel has surrendered his passport.
 
Judge Swain set a sentencing date for Kugel of May 4, 2012, at 11:00 a.m.
Charges against Bongiorno and Crupi remain pending and are merely accusations. They are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
 
Mr. Bharara praised the investigative work of the FBI. He also thanked the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for its assistance.
 
These cases were brought in coordination with President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, on which Mr. Bharara serves as a Co-Chair of the Securities and Commodities Fraud Working Group. President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes.
The case is being handled by the Office’s Securities and Commodities Fraud Task Force. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Lisa A. Baroni, Julian J. Moore, Arlo Devlin-Brown, Barbara A. Ward and Matthew L. Schwartz are in charge of the prosecution.

Monday, November 21, 2011

Measures to Increase Pressure on Iran

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
 
Secretary of Treasury Tim Geithner
November 21, 2011
 
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, good afternoon, everyone. I am delighted to welcome Secretary Geithner here to the Treaty Room of the State Department, and I also welcome his team and thank my team for the work that they have been doing with respect to Iran.
 
Recent days have brought new evidence that Iran’s leaders continue to defy their international obligations and violate international norms, including the recent plot to assassinate the Saudi Ambassador here in the United States and as verified by the new report from the International Atomic Energy Agency that further documents Iran’s conduct of activities directly related to the development of nuclear weapons. Now, this report from the IAEA is not the United States or our European partners making accusations; this is the result of an independent review and it reflects the judgment of the international community.
 
There have to be consequences for such behavior. So on Friday, Iran was condemned in votes at the UN in New York and at the IAEA in Vienna. And earlier today, the UN General Assembly again strongly reprimanded Iran for continuing human rights abuses, persecution of minorities, and forcible restrictions on political freedom. The message is clear: If Iran’s intransigence continues, it will face increasing pressure and isolation.
 
Today the United States is taking a series of steps to sharpen this choice.
 
First, President Obama signed an Executive Order that, for the first time, specifically targets Iran’s petrochemical industry, a significant source of export revenues and a cover for imports for sanctioned activities. This will allow us to sanction the provision of goods, services, and technology to the petrochemical sector. To accompany this new measure, we will launch a worldwide diplomatic campaign to encourage other countries to shift any purchases of Iranian petrochemical products to other suppliers.
 
Second, in the same Executive Order, we are expanding sanctions on Iran’s oil and gas business. U.S. law already sanctions large-scale investments in up-stream exploration and development of oil and gas, and now it will also be sanctionable to provide goods, services, and technology for those activities as well. This will make it more difficult for Iran to work around the sanctions and will further impede efforts to maintain and modernize its oil and gas sector.
 
Third, under an existing Executive Order, we are designating a number of individuals and entities
 
for their roles in assisting Iran’s prohibited nuclear programs, including its enrichment and heavy water programs. Their assets subject to U.S. jurisdiction will be frozen and American individuals and entities will be prohibited from engaging in any transactions with them.
 
And finally, as Secretary Geithner will discuss in more detail, the Treasury Department is formally identifying Iran as a jurisdiction of primary money laundering concern. This is the strongest official warning we can give that any transaction with Iran poses serious risks of deception or diversion.
 
These steps were accompanied today by complementary measures by the UK and Canada, and we expect additional sanctions by other international partners in the days ahead.
 
Together, these measures represent a significant ratcheting up of pressure on Iran, its sources of income, and its illegal activities. They build on an extensive existing sanctions regime put into place by the UN Security Council and a large number of countries, including our own, acting nationally and multilaterally to implement the Council’s measures. And these sanctions are already having a dramatic effect. They have almost completely isolated Iran from the international financial sector and have made it very risky and costly a place to do business.
 
Most of the world’s major energy companies have left, undermining Iran’s efforts to boost its declining oil production, its main source of revenues. Iran has found it much more difficult to operate its national airline and shipping companies, and to procure equipment and technology for its prohibited weapons programs. And those individuals and organizations responsible for terrorism and human rights abuses, including the Revolutionary Guard Corps and its Qods Force, have been specifically targeted.
 
The impact will only grow unless Iran’s leaders decide to change course and meet their international obligations. And let me be clear: Today’s actions do not exhaust our opportunities to sanction Iran. We continue actively to consider a range of increasingly aggressive measures. We have worked closely with Congress and have put to effective use the legislative tools they have provided. We are committed to continuing our collaboration to develop additional sanctions that will have the effect we all want: putting strong pressure on Iran.
 
Now, the Administration’s dual-track strategy is not only about pressure. It is also about engaging Iran, engagement that would be aimed at resolving the international community’s serious and growing concerns about Iran’s nuclear program. And the United States is committed to engagement, but only – and I say only – if Iran is prepared to engage seriously and concretely without preconditions. So far, we have seen little indication that Iran is serious about negotiations on its nuclear program. And until we do, and until Iran’s leaders live up to their international obligations, they will face increasing consequences.
 
Now I would like to invite Secretary Geithner to explain in more depth how some of these sanctions will be working.
 
Tim.
 
SECRETARY GEITHNER: Thank you, Secretary Clinton, and my compliments also to your colleagues and to ours – to mine, led by David Cohen and Danny Glaser, for doing such a great job today on these very significant financial actions.
 
Since the President came into office, this Administration has executed a very aggressive strategy to stop Iran’s illicit activities. A key part of this strategy has been to impose overwhelming financial pressure on Iran, and because of this strategy, Iran has been subjected to new and damaging levels of financial and commercial isolation.
 
First, we have dramatically reduced Iran’s access to the international financial system. Iranian banks are losing the ability to do business around the world, which in turn has reduced the ability of the government to finance activities opposed by the international community.
 
Second, Iran’s national shipping line, which has transported material in support of Iran’s missile program, is now shut off from many of the world’s major ports and routinely finds its ships seized or turned away.
 
And third, Iran’s primary source of revenue, its oil sector, is in decline because it cannot attract the foreign investment that it desperately needs to maintain levels of production.
 
Together, the intensification of sanctions by this Administration, alongside our partners around the world, has inflicted substantial damage to the Iranian economy. To continue these efforts, the Treasury Department today is designating additional entities for their support of Iran’s nuclear and proliferation-related activities.
 
Today, we are taking the very significant step of acting under Section 311 of the Patriot Act. For the first time, we are identifying the entire Iranian banking sector, including the Central Bank of Iran, as a threat to governments or financial institutions that do business with Iranian banks. If you are a financial institutions anywhere in the world and you engage in any transaction involving Iran’s central bank or any other Iranian bank operating inside or outside Iran, then you are at risk of supporting Iran’s illicit activities: its support – its pursuit of nuclear weapons, its support for terrorism, and its efforts to deceive responsible financial institutions and to evade sanctions. Any and every financial transaction with Iran poses grave risk of supporting those activities, so financial institutions around the world should think hard about the risks of doing business with Iran.
 
We are taking this action, as the Secretary said, alongside our partners in the United Kingdom and Canada, who announced earlier today that they were implementing similar measures to insulate their banks from Iran. And as a result of this coordinated effort, Iran is now cut off from three of the world’s largest financial sectors. We encourage other leaders around the world to take forceful steps like these actions to prevent Iran from simply shifting financial activity to banks within their nations.
 
As we put these new measures in place and as we continue to work to expand their reach around the world, we will continue to explore other measures. No option is off the table, including the possibility of imposing additional sanctions on the Central Bank of Iran. The policies Iran is pursuing are unacceptable, and until Iran’s leadership agrees to abandon this dangerous course, we will continue to use tough and innovative means to impose severe economic and financial consequences on Iran’s leadership.
 
Thank you.
 
SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you all very much.

In Case You Missed It: Ron Paul Makes Statement on Super Committee

“This shows how unserious politicians are about our very serious debt problems”
 
LAKE JACKSON, Texas – 2012 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul released a statement today regarding the congressional Super Committee’s failure to meet its goal with the deadline fast approaching. See below for statement.
 
“This week marks the deadline for the so-called congressional Super Committee to meet its goal of cutting a laughably small amount of federal spending over the next decade.  In fact the Committee merely needs to cut about $120 billion annually from the federal budget over the next 10 years to meet its modest goals, but even this paltry amount has produced hand-wringing and hysteria on Capitol Hill.  This is only cutting proposed increases.  It has nothing to do with actually cutting anything.  This shows how unserious politicians are about our very serious debt problems.
 
“To be fair, however, in one sense members of the Super Committee face an impossible task.  They must, in effect, cut government spending without first addressing the role of government in our society.  They must continue to insist the federal government can provide Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits in the future as promised, while maintaining our wildly interventionist foreign policy.  Yet everyone knows this is a lie.
 
“Keep in mind that the 2011 federal deficit alone was about $1.3 trillion, which means the Super Committee needs to cut that much PER YEAR rather than over a 10 year period.  If Congress ever hopes to address its debt problem, it must first stop accumulating any new debt immediately, in 2012.
 
“Federal revenue likely will be about $2.3 trillion in fiscal 2012.  The 2004 federal budget was about $2.3 trillion.  So Congress simply needs to adopt the 2004 budget next year and the federal government will balance outlays and revenue.  That’s all it would take to produce a balanced budget right now.  Was the federal government really too small just 7 years ago, in 2004?  Of course not.  Only Washington hysteria would have us believe otherwise.
 
“Yet our Republican and Democrat friends on the Super Committee want to take 10 years, or even 30 years, to produce a balanced budget.
 
“Government spending isn’t just wasteful; it is often actively harmful to stated goals.  The Super Committee could simply apply 2004 spending levels across the board and a tremendous victory for fiscal sanity would be accomplished.
 
“What seems more likely, however, is a rearrangement of the tax code in an attempt to bring in more revenue.  Deductions and credits will be taken away, and the Bush tax cuts will be allowed to expire.  As a result, less money will remain in the private sector to create jobs and produce economic growth.  The Super Committee has an opportunity to take a small baby step in the right direction.  Instead, they no doubt will take this opportunity to raise taxes and make everything worse.  But increasing taxes will only diminish freedom and deepen the recession.  Instead of looking for ways to hike taxes under the guise of “raising revenue,” the Super Committee should put forth a plan of real spending cuts to put America back on the path to liberty and prosperity.”

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Shakespeare: The Ultimate Market Product

By Morgan A. Brown
 
Shakespeare's status as a legendary playwright is partly the outcome of four centuries of textual revision and reconstruction. Much of the work that went into perfecting Shakespeare's published texts was done in the first six decades of the 18th century. During that period, no fewer than six major editions of Shakespeare's dramatic corpus appeared on the London book market, published by Jacob Tonson and his eponymous great-nephew.
 
Each edition that the Tonsons produced was subject to fierce debate, fiery criticism, and market competition. What emerged from this process of competition and redistribution in the 1700s was a Shakespeare more ordered, digestible, and masterful than any other shade of the Bard that had existed 100 years prior.
 
Shakespeare's contemporary, Ben Jonson, praised the Bard's plays as "not of an age, but for all time" in the posthumous First Folio (1623) edition of Shakespeare's plays. But such inflated encomia were so common in Elizabethan and Stuart England that anyone familiar with commendatory verses treats such panegyrics as mere convention. In other words… (Read more)
 
Source: Mises.org

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Senator Rand Paul: Stop the Madness!

Dear lover of liberty,
 
In the next few weeks, I believe one of the most importantvotes of our political lifetimes will occur when the House and Senate each vote on a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution.  The stage isset for a remarkable victory that could help save our economy and end the tax-spend-borrow addiction in Washington.
 
For years, our deficits have been soaring out of control.  President Obama has proposed a "budget" that will stillallow a $1.6 trillion deficit.  And Republicans are hardly better, with their budget calling for "only" a $1.5 trillion deficit.
 
The threats to our prosperity and freedom aren't hard to see.  Just look all around us, everyday, at the news coming from Washington.  More bailouts, trillion dollar "stimulus" schemes, huge new debt burdens for our children,higher taxes – it never ends.
 
You and I have a chance to help put a stop to these abuses ofpower.  And because the Balanced Budget legislation is a Constitutional Amendment, we don't need President Obama to sign it.  Congress alonecan fix this problem.
 
But without your involvement, I don't think it will happen.
 
Please see this message from my friend Matt Hawes, Vice President of Campaign for Liberty, so you canlearn more about their battle to help pass a Balanced Budget Amendment in Congress.  Time is short, so please take action today.
 
 
For Liberty,
 
Rand Paul
U.S. Senator, Kentucky